Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringGooshays wardP0339.26
Planning application · Havering

P0339.26.

8 Paines Brook Way Romford RM3 9JP

Full / Other Planning at 8 Paines Brook Way Romford RM3 9JP, received 19 Mar 2026 — approved on 22 May 2026 (delegated, Marnie Smith).

HaveringGooshaysRM3 9JPP0339.26
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
22 May 2026
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
3
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Retention of loft to habitable use with roof light and for 2 x single storey detached outbuildings to rear for use as gym and office/storage

Reference
P0339.26
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM3 9JP
Council
Received
19 Mar 2026
Validated
30 Mar 2026
Target date
25 May 2026
Decision date
22 May 2026
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P0339.26
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM3 9JP
Council
Received
19 Mar 2026
Validated
30 Mar 2026
Target date
25 May 2026
Decision date
22 May 2026
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 22 May 2026, delegated decision by Marnie Smith — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
19 Mar 2026
Application received
30 Mar 2026
Application validated
25 May 2026
Statutory target date
22 May 2026
Delegated decision: Approved · Marnie Smith
19 Mar 2026
Application received
30 Mar 2026
Application validated
25 May 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
22 May 2026
Delegated decision: Approved · Marnie Smith

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.