Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringArdleigh Green wardP0371.98
Planning application · Havering

P0371.98.

79 Amery Gardens Gidea Park Romford

Full / Other Planning at 79 Amery Gardens Gidea Park Romford, received 26 Mar 2098 — approved on 31 Jul 2098 (delegated, Stephen Perkins).

No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
31 Jul 2098
18 wks
Decision time
10 wks over the 8-week target
5
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey rear extension and dormer window to rear roofslope

Reference
P0371.98
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
26 Mar 2098
Validated
1 Apr 2098
Target date
18 May 2098
Decision date
31 Jul 2098
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P0371.98
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
26 Mar 2098
Validated
1 Apr 2098
Target date
18 May 2098
Decision date
31 Jul 2098
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 31 Jul 2098, delegated decision by Stephen Perkins — 18 weeks from submission (10 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
26 Mar 2098
Application received
1 Apr 2098
Application validated
18 May 2098
Statutory target date
31 Jul 2098
Delegated decision: Approved · Stephen Perkins
26 Mar 2098
Application received
1 Apr 2098
Application validated
18 May 2098
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
31 Jul 2098
Delegated decision: Approved · Stephen Perkins

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.