Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Havering›…Heaton ward›P0389.16
Planning application · Havering

P0389.16.

63 Harrow Crescent Romford RM3 7BJ

Full / Other Planning at 63 Harrow Crescent Romford RM3 7BJ, received 4 May 2016 — approved on 21 Jul 2017 (delegated, Saeed Mahmood).

Havering›Heaton›RM3 7BJ›P0389.16
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
21 Jul 2017
63 wks
Decision time
55 wks over the 8-week target
18
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a 2 bedroom bungalow

Reference
P0389.16
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM3 7BJ
Ward
Council
Received
4 May 2016
Target date
31 Jul 2017
Decision date
21 Jul 2017
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with Agreement Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Reference
P0389.16
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM3 7BJ
Ward
Council
Received
4 May 2016
Target date
31 Jul 2017
Decision date
21 Jul 2017
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with Agreement Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 21 Jul 2017, delegated decision by Saeed Mahmood — 63 weeks from submission (55 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
4 May 2016
Application received
31 Jul 2017
Statutory target date
21 Jul 2017
Delegated decision: Approved · Saeed Mahmood
4 May 2016
Application received
31 Jul 2017
Statutory target date
21 Jul 2017
Delegated decision: Approved · Saeed Mahmood

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.