Planning application · Havering
P0389.24.
16 Woburn Avenue Hornchurch RM12 4NG
Full / Other Planning at 16 Woburn Avenue Hornchurch RM12 4NG, received 18 Mar 2024 — refused on 13 May 2024 (delegated, Cole Hodder).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
13 May 2024
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
3
Conditions
attached to the decision
6
Documents
6 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Rear Dormer Extension & Hip to Gable Roof Alterations
Reference
P0389.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM12 4NG
Ward
Council
Received
18 Mar 2024
Target date
13 May 2024
Decision date
13 May 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Reference
P0389.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM12 4NG
Ward
Council
Received
18 Mar 2024
Target date
13 May 2024
Decision date
13 May 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 13 May 2024, delegated decision by Cole Hodder — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
18 Mar 2024
Application received
13 May 2024
Statutory target date
13 May 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Cole Hodder
18 Mar 2024
Application received
13 May 2024
Statutory target date
13 May 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Cole Hodder
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
At the time the application was submitted and later when visiting the site, the dwelling
implemented under ref: P0960.22 was not completed/occupied and no roof had been
constructed. Accordingly it is considered that a householder application has been submitted
HAVPDECR (ODB Jan 2022) P0389.24 - 13th May 2024 1 of 4
prematurely as the subject of the full planning application has not been completed in
accordance with the approved plans.
2
The proposed gabled end would represent a significant increase in mass at roof level, which
would not reflect the character of the terraced row, or the scheme as it was approved. The
resultant dwelling would upset the rhythm of the terraced row and would present as visually
dominant, detrimental to local character and the street-scene. As such the development would
be detrimental to the character and appearance of the host property and local character and
would therefore be contrary to Havering Local Plan Policies 7 and 26 and the design guidance
within the Council's Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD.
1
At the time the application was submitted and later when visiting the site, the dwelling
implemented under ref: P0960.22 was not completed/occupied and no roof had been
constructed. Accordingly it is considered that a householder application has been submitted
HAVPDECR (ODB Jan 2022) P0389.24 - 13th May 2024 1 of 4
prematurely as the subject of the full planning application has not been completed in
accordance with the approved plans.
2
The proposed gabled end would represent a significant increase in mass at roof level, which
would not reflect the character of the terraced row, or the scheme as it was approved. The
resultant dwelling would upset the rhythm of the terraced row and would present as visually
dominant, detrimental to local character and the street-scene. As such the development would
be detrimental to the character and appearance of the host property and local character and
would therefore be contrary to Havering Local Plan Policies 7 and 26 and the design guidance
within the Council's Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD.
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.