Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringMawneys wardP0401.26
Planning application · Havering

P0401.26.

37 Thameshill Avenue Romford RM5 3BU

Full / Other Planning at 37 Thameshill Avenue Romford RM5 3BU, received 30 Mar 2026 — refused on 4 Jun 2026 (delegated, Aidan Hughes).

HaveringMawneysRM5 3BUP0401.26
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
4 Jun 2026
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
3
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a ground floor rear extension and change of use from a dwellinghouse (Class C3) to a five-bedroom/five-person small HMO within Class C4, together with bicycle and bin storage.

Reference
P0401.26
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM5 3BU
Council
Received
30 Mar 2026
Validated
9 Apr 2026
Target date
4 Jun 2026
Decision date
4 Jun 2026
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P0401.26
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM5 3BU
Council
Received
30 Mar 2026
Validated
9 Apr 2026
Target date
4 Jun 2026
Decision date
4 Jun 2026
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 4 Jun 2026, delegated decision by Aidan Hughes — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
30 Mar 2026
Application received
9 Apr 2026
Application validated
4 Jun 2026
Statutory target date
4 Jun 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Aidan Hughes
30 Mar 2026
Application received
9 Apr 2026
Application validated
4 Jun 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
4 Jun 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Aidan Hughes

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.