Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringHacton wardP0444.26
Planning application · Havering

P0444.26.

FLATS 1-10 CHELTENHAM COURT 20 HAYDOCK CLOSE HORNCHURCH

Full / Other Planning at FLATS 1-10 CHELTENHAM COURT 20 HAYDOCK CLOSE HORNCHURCH, received 7 Apr 2026 — undecided.

HaveringHactonP0444.26
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Undecided
Outcome
no decision date
Decision time
submission → decision
0
Conditions
attached to the decision
4
Documents
4 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Variation of condition No.2 (Approved plans) of planning permission P0409.24 dated 18/12/2024 to permit a 300mm increase in ridge height (Additional storey to block B to provide 1 x 1-bed flat and 1 x 2-bed flat)

Reference
P0444.26
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
7 Apr 2026
Validated
20 Apr 2026
Target date
15 Jun 2026
Decision date
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Undecided
Reference
P0444.26
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
7 Apr 2026
Validated
20 Apr 2026
Target date
15 Jun 2026
Decision date
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Undecided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Supporting Document
Drawing
Drawing
Application Form
Supporting Document
Drawing
Drawing
Show all 4 rows
Application Form

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Status: Undecided. No decision is recorded yet.

Timeline

Date
Event
7 Apr 2026
Application received
20 Apr 2026
Application validated
15 Jun 2026
Statutory target date
7 Apr 2026
Application received
20 Apr 2026
Application validated
15 Jun 2026
Statutory target date

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.