Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringMawney ward31 Elm Road RomfordP0472.98
Planning application · Havering

P0472.98.

31 Elm Road Romford

Full / Other Planning at 31 Elm Road Romford, received 21 Apr 2098 — approved on 3 Sep 2098 (delegated, Rick Younger).

HaveringMawneyP0472.98
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
3 Sep 2098
19 wks
Decision time
11 wks over the 8-week target
4
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Ground and first floor rear extension with roof alteration

Reference
P0472.98
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
21 Apr 2098
Validated
28 Apr 2098
Target date
16 Jun 2098
Decision date
3 Sep 2098
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P0472.98
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
21 Apr 2098
Validated
28 Apr 2098
Target date
16 Jun 2098
Decision date
3 Sep 2098
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 3 Sep 2098, delegated decision by Rick Younger — 19 weeks from submission (11 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
21 Apr 2098
Application received
28 Apr 2098
Application validated
16 Jun 2098
Statutory target date
3 Sep 2098
Delegated decision: Approved · Rick Younger
21 Apr 2098
Application received
28 Apr 2098
Application validated
16 Jun 2098
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
3 Sep 2098
Delegated decision: Approved · Rick Younger

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.