Planning application · Havering
P0504.24.
12 King Edward Avenue Rainham RM13 9RJ
Full / Other Planning at 12 King Edward Avenue Rainham RM13 9RJ, received 10 Apr 2024 — refused on 1 Oct 2024 (delegated, Kara Johnston).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
1 Oct 2024
25 wks
Decision time
17 wks over the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
7
Documents
7 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Permission for change of use from a single residential dwelling (C3) to Sui Generis -House in Multiple Occupation, to provide supported living care for up to 7 people
Reference
P0504.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM13 9RJ
Council
Received
10 Apr 2024
Validated
11 Apr 2024
Target date
30 Sep 2024
Decision date
1 Oct 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Reference
P0504.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM13 9RJ
Council
Received
10 Apr 2024
Validated
11 Apr 2024
Target date
30 Sep 2024
Decision date
1 Oct 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 1 Oct 2024, delegated decision by Kara Johnston — 25 weeks from submission (17 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
10 Apr 2024
Application received
11 Apr 2024
Application validated
30 Sep 2024
Statutory target date
1 Oct 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Kara Johnston
10 Apr 2024
Application received
11 Apr 2024
Application validated
30 Sep 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
1 Oct 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Kara Johnston
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposal would, by reason of noise and disturbance caused by the significant
intensification of the site's residential use with of adult occupants and care workers entering
and leaving the premises, and the likelihood of vehicles parking and manoeuvring, particularly
during the evening hours of operation, be unacceptably detrimental to the amenities of
occupiers of adjacent properties, contrary to Policy 7 of the Havering Local Plan 2016-2031
and Paragraph 30 of the National Planning Policy Framework.
2
Given the site has a Public Transport Access Level of 1b, the proposal is in conflict with criteria
ii. (The site has access to essential services and shops by walking and cycling) and iii (The
site is well served by public transport) of Policy 6 of the Havering Local Plan 2016-2031. As
the development is not considered meet the required standards outlined, the development is
not within a suitable location and is therefore not acceptable in principle.
1
The proposal would, by reason of noise and disturbance caused by the significant
intensification of the site's residential use with of adult occupants and care workers entering
and leaving the premises, and the likelihood of vehicles parking and manoeuvring, particularly
during the evening hours of operation, be unacceptably detrimental to the amenities of
occupiers of adjacent properties, contrary to Policy 7 of the Havering Local Plan 2016-2031
and Paragraph 30 of the National Planning Policy Framework.
2
Given the site has a Public Transport Access Level of 1b, the proposal is in conflict with criteria
ii. (The site has access to essential services and shops by walking and cycling) and iii (The
site is well served by public transport) of Policy 6 of the Havering Local Plan 2016-2031. As
the development is not considered meet the required standards outlined, the development is
not within a suitable location and is therefore not acceptable in principle.
Policies cited
Havering Local Plan 7National Planning Policy Framework 30NPPFHavering Local Plan 6
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.