Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Havering›…Ardleigh Green ward9 Montrose Avenue Gidea Park Romford›P0505.99
Planning application · Havering

P0505.99.

9 Montrose Avenue Gidea Park Romford

Full / Other Planning at 9 Montrose Avenue Gidea Park Romford, received 14 Apr 2099 — approved on 19 May 2099 (delegated, Philip Comer).

No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
19 May 2099
5 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
6
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey rear extension

Reference
P0505.99
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
14 Apr 2099
Validated
21 Apr 2099
Target date
9 Jun 2099
Decision date
19 May 2099
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Reference
P0505.99
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
14 Apr 2099
Validated
21 Apr 2099
Target date
9 Jun 2099
Decision date
19 May 2099
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 19 May 2099, delegated decision by Philip Comer — 5 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
14 Apr 2099
Application received
21 Apr 2099
Application validated
9 Jun 2099
Statutory target date
19 May 2099
Delegated decision: Approved · Philip Comer
14 Apr 2099
Application received
21 Apr 2099
Application validated
9 Jun 2099
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
19 May 2099
Delegated decision: Approved · Philip Comer

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.