Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringRainham wardP0506.02
Planning application · Havering

P0506.02.

132 Lake Avenue Rainham

Full / Other Planning at 132 Lake Avenue Rainham, received 22 Mar 2002 — approved on 16 Dec 2002 (delegated, Craig Gilbert).

HaveringRainhamP0506.02
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
16 Dec 2002
38 wks
Decision time
30 wks over the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Retention of detached double garage

Reference
P0506.02
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
22 Mar 2002
Target date
17 May 2002
Decision date
16 Dec 2002
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P0506.02
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
22 Mar 2002
Target date
17 May 2002
Decision date
16 Dec 2002
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 16 Dec 2002, delegated decision by Craig Gilbert — 38 weeks from submission (30 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
22 Mar 2002
Application received
17 May 2002
Statutory target date
16 Dec 2002
Delegated decision: Approved · Craig Gilbert
22 Mar 2002
Application received
17 May 2002
Statutory target date
16 Dec 2002
Delegated decision: Approved · Craig Gilbert

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.