Planning application · Havering
P0556.24.
16 Simpson Road Rainham RM13 7LB
Full / Other Planning at 16 Simpson Road Rainham RM13 7LB, received 18 Apr 2024 — refused on 18 Jun 2024 (delegated, Marnie Smith).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
18 Jun 2024
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
5
Conditions
attached to the decision
8
Documents
8 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of a two storey end of terrace dwelling house adjoining 16 Simpson Road and part single storey and part two storey rear extension to 16 Simpson Road
Reference
P0556.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
18 Apr 2024
Validated
23 Apr 2024
Target date
18 Jun 2024
Decision date
18 Jun 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse (Appealed) Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Reference
P0556.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
18 Apr 2024
Validated
23 Apr 2024
Target date
18 Jun 2024
Decision date
18 Jun 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse (Appealed) Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 18 Jun 2024, delegated decision by Marnie Smith — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
18 Apr 2024
Application received
23 Apr 2024
Application validated
18 Jun 2024
Statutory target date
18 Jun 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Marnie Smith
18 Apr 2024
Application received
23 Apr 2024
Application validated
18 Jun 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
18 Jun 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Marnie Smith
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The layout of the development would be inadequate resulting in substandard accommodation
for future residents through insufficient internal space with regards to bedroom sizes, thereby
giving rise to a poor quality residential environment, harmful to the amenities of the occupiers.
As a result, the development would be contrary to Policy 7 of the Havering Local Plan and
Policy D6 of the London Plan.
HAVPDECR (ODB Jan 2022) P0556.24 - 18th June 2024 1 of 4
2
The proposed development would, by reason of its height, positioning close to the side
boundary, bulk and mass, appear as a dominant and visually intrusive development, which
would unduly enclose the street scene at this prominent location and would also give rise to a
form of development which is at odds with the prevailing character of development in the
locality, thereby materially harmful to the character and appearance of the surrounding area,
contrary to Policy 7 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan.
3
The proposal would provide no parking for the new dwelling leading to an increased demand
for on-road parking in the area to the detriment of the safety and functioning of the highway
contrary to Policy 24 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan and Policy T6 of the London Plan.
1
The layout of the development would be inadequate resulting in substandard accommodation
for future residents through insufficient internal space with regards to bedroom sizes, thereby
giving rise to a poor quality residential environment, harmful to the amenities of the occupiers.
As a result, the development would be contrary to Policy 7 of the Havering Local Plan and
Policy D6 of the London Plan.
HAVPDECR (ODB Jan 2022) P0556.24 - 18th June 2024 1 of 4
2
The proposed development would, by reason of its height, positioning close to the side
boundary, bulk and mass, appear as a dominant and visually intrusive development, which
would unduly enclose the street scene at this prominent location and would also give rise to a
form of development which is at odds with the prevailing character of development in the
locality, thereby materially harmful to the character and appearance of the surrounding area,
contrary to Policy 7 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan.
3
The proposal would provide no parking for the new dwelling leading to an increased demand
for on-road parking in the area to the detriment of the safety and functioning of the highway
contrary to Policy 24 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan and Policy T6 of the London Plan.
Policies cited
Havering Local Plan 7D6Havering Local Plan 26Havering Local Plan 24T6
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.