Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringHacton wardP0569.21
Planning application · Havering

P0569.21.

99 Suttons Avenue Hornchurch RM12 4LZ

Full / Other Planning at 99 Suttons Avenue Hornchurch RM12 4LZ, received 25 Mar 2021 — approved on 1 Oct 2021 (delegated, Jade Marshall).

HaveringHactonRM12 4LZP0569.21
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
1 Oct 2021
27 wks
Decision time
19 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
7
Documents
7 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Second storey rear extension.

Reference
P0569.21
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM12 4LZ
Ward
Council
Received
25 Mar 2021
Target date
1 Oct 2021
Decision date
1 Oct 2021
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P0569.21
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM12 4LZ
Ward
Council
Received
25 Mar 2021
Target date
1 Oct 2021
Decision date
1 Oct 2021
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
Decision Notice
Drawing
Supporting Document
Supporting Document
Application Form
Drawing
Decision Notice
Decision Notice
Drawing
Show all 7 rows
Supporting Document
Supporting Document
Application Form
Drawing

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 1 Oct 2021, delegated decision by Jade Marshall — 27 weeks from submission (19 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
25 Mar 2021
Application received
1 Oct 2021
Statutory target date
1 Oct 2021
Delegated decision: Approved · Jade Marshall
25 Mar 2021
Application received
1 Oct 2021
Statutory target date
1 Oct 2021
Delegated decision: Approved · Jade Marshall

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.