Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringMawney ward9 Lowshoe Lane Collier Row RomfordP0596.99
Planning application · Havering

P0596.99.

9 Lowshoe Lane Collier Row Romford

Full / Other Planning at 9 Lowshoe Lane Collier Row Romford, received 4 May 2099 — approved on 25 Jun 2099 (delegated, Rick Younger).

HaveringMawneyP0596.99
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
25 Jun 2099
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
5
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey rear extension

Reference
P0596.99
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
4 May 2099
Validated
10 May 2099
Target date
29 Jun 2099
Decision date
25 Jun 2099
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P0596.99
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
4 May 2099
Validated
10 May 2099
Target date
29 Jun 2099
Decision date
25 Jun 2099
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 25 Jun 2099, delegated decision by Rick Younger — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
4 May 2099
Application received
10 May 2099
Application validated
29 Jun 2099
Statutory target date
25 Jun 2099
Delegated decision: Approved · Rick Younger
4 May 2099
Application received
10 May 2099
Application validated
29 Jun 2099
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
25 Jun 2099
Delegated decision: Approved · Rick Younger

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.