Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Havering›…Beam Park ward›P0608.25
Planning application · Havering

P0608.25.

14 Christchurch Avenue Rainham RM13 8JB

Full / Other Planning at 14 Christchurch Avenue Rainham RM13 8JB, received 2 May 2025 — refused on 27 Jun 2025 (delegated, Habib Neshat).

Havering›Beam Park›RM13 8JB›P0608.25
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
27 Jun 2025
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
4
Conditions
attached to the decision
6
Documents
6 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Part retrospective application for a two storey side extension

Reference
P0608.25
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM13 8JB
Ward
Council
Received
2 May 2025
Target date
27 Jun 2025
Decision date
27 Jun 2025
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Reference
P0608.25
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM13 8JB
Ward
Council
Received
2 May 2025
Target date
27 Jun 2025
Decision date
27 Jun 2025
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
—
Decision Notice
—
Supporting Document
—
Drawing
—
Drawing
—
Application Form
—
Decision Notice
—
Decision Notice
—
Supporting Document
—
Show all 6 rows
Drawing
—
Drawing
—
Application Form
—

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 27 Jun 2025, delegated decision by Habib Neshat — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
2 May 2025
Application received
27 Jun 2025
Statutory target date
27 Jun 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Habib Neshat
2 May 2025
Application received
27 Jun 2025
Statutory target date
27 Jun 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Habib Neshat

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.