Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringGooshays ward13 Amersham Close Harold Hill RomfordP0685.97
Planning application · Havering

P0685.97.

13 Amersham Close Harold Hill Romford

Full / Other Planning at 13 Amersham Close Harold Hill Romford, received 4 Jun 2097 — approved on 30 Jul 2097 (delegated, Matt Gallagher).

HaveringGooshaysP0685.97
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
30 Jul 2097
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
5
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey rear extension

Reference
P0685.97
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
4 Jun 2097
Validated
13 Jun 2097
Target date
30 Jul 2097
Decision date
30 Jul 2097
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P0685.97
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
4 Jun 2097
Validated
13 Jun 2097
Target date
30 Jul 2097
Decision date
30 Jul 2097
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 30 Jul 2097, delegated decision by Matt Gallagher — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
4 Jun 2097
Application received
13 Jun 2097
Application validated
30 Jul 2097
Statutory target date
30 Jul 2097
Delegated decision: Approved · Matt Gallagher
4 Jun 2097
Application received
13 Jun 2097
Application validated
30 Jul 2097
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
30 Jul 2097
Delegated decision: Approved · Matt Gallagher

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.