Planning application · Havering
P0686.07.
Full / Other Planning at 2 Engayne Gardens Upminster, received 10 Apr 2007 — approved on 24 May 2007 (delegated, Matthew Letten).
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
24 May 2007
6 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
5
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Single storey rear extension
Reference
P0686.07
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
10 Apr 2007
Target date
5 Jun 2007
Decision date
24 May 2007
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Reference
P0686.07
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
10 Apr 2007
Target date
5 Jun 2007
Decision date
24 May 2007
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
No documents are recorded for this application.
Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Approved on 24 May 2007, delegated decision by Matthew Letten — 6 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
10 Apr 2007
Application received
5 Jun 2007
Statutory target date
24 May 2007
Delegated decision: Approved · Matthew Letten
10 Apr 2007
Application received
5 Jun 2007
Statutory target date
24 May 2007
Delegated decision: Approved · Matthew Letten
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.