Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringHarold Wood wardP0695.97
Planning application · Havering

P0695.97.

Former B & Q Southend Arterial Road Gallows Corner Romford

Full / Other Planning at Former B & Q Southend Arterial Road Gallows Corner Romford, received 5 Jun 2097 — approved on 12 Dec 2097 (delegated, Rick Younger).

HaveringHarold WoodP0695.97
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
12 Dec 2097
27 wks
Decision time
19 wks over the 8-week target
4
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Refurbishment of existing store for non-food retail with no sub-division

Reference
P0695.97
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
5 Jun 2097
Validated
18 Jun 2097
Target date
31 Jul 2097
Decision date
12 Dec 2097
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P0695.97
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
5 Jun 2097
Validated
18 Jun 2097
Target date
31 Jul 2097
Decision date
12 Dec 2097
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 12 Dec 2097, delegated decision by Rick Younger — 27 weeks from submission (19 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
5 Jun 2097
Application received
18 Jun 2097
Application validated
31 Jul 2097
Statutory target date
12 Dec 2097
Delegated decision: Approved · Rick Younger
5 Jun 2097
Application received
18 Jun 2097
Application validated
31 Jul 2097
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
12 Dec 2097
Delegated decision: Approved · Rick Younger

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.