Planning application · Havering
P0803.24.
11A Stour Way Upminster RM14 1QQ
Full / Other Planning at 11A Stour Way Upminster RM14 1QQ, received 6 Jun 2024 — refused on 7 Aug 2024 (delegated, Aidan Hughes).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
7 Aug 2024
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
4
Conditions
attached to the decision
8
Documents
8 linked
0
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Part single, part two storey side and single storey rear extension with new patio/fencing and front porch following demolition of existing garage and loft conversion with rear dormer and roof lights to front
Reference
P0803.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
6 Jun 2024
Validated
12 Jun 2024
Target date
7 Aug 2024
Decision date
7 Aug 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Reference
P0803.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
6 Jun 2024
Validated
12 Jun 2024
Target date
7 Aug 2024
Decision date
7 Aug 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 7 Aug 2024, delegated decision by Aidan Hughes — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
6 Jun 2024
Application received
12 Jun 2024
Application validated
7 Aug 2024
Statutory target date
7 Aug 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Aidan Hughes
6 Jun 2024
Application received
12 Jun 2024
Application validated
7 Aug 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
7 Aug 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Aidan Hughes
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed roof alteration from a hip to gable roof would appear as an incongruous and
HAVPDECR (ODB Jan 2022) P0803.24 - 7th August 2024 1 of 4
unacceptably visually harmful feature in the street scene and rear garden environment harmful
to the appearance of the host property, the prevailing character of development and visual
amenity in the surrounding area contrary to Policy 26 of the Havering Local Plan, D4 of the
London Plan and the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning
Document.
2
The proposed rear dormer window would, by reason of its height, position and bulk appear out
of scale and character with the dwelling and materially harmful to the visual amenity of the
surrounding area contrary to Havering Local Plan Policy 26, London Plan Policy D4 and the
design guidance within the Council's Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD.
3
The proposed development would, by reason of its excessive height, depth and position close
to the boundaries of the site, be an intrusive and unneighbourly development as well as having
an adverse effect on the amenities of adjacent occupiers at No.11 Stour Way, Upminster
contrary to Policy 7 of the Havering Local Plan and the Residential Extensions and Alterations
Supplementary Planning Document.
1
The proposed roof alteration from a hip to gable roof would appear as an incongruous and
HAVPDECR (ODB Jan 2022) P0803.24 - 7th August 2024 1 of 4
unacceptably visually harmful feature in the street scene and rear garden environment harmful
to the appearance of the host property, the prevailing character of development and visual
amenity in the surrounding area contrary to Policy 26 of the Havering Local Plan, D4 of the
London Plan and the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning
Document.
2
The proposed rear dormer window would, by reason of its height, position and bulk appear out
of scale and character with the dwelling and materially harmful to the visual amenity of the
surrounding area contrary to Havering Local Plan Policy 26, London Plan Policy D4 and the
design guidance within the Council's Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD.
3
The proposed development would, by reason of its excessive height, depth and position close
to the boundaries of the site, be an intrusive and unneighbourly development as well as having
an adverse effect on the amenities of adjacent occupiers at No.11 Stour Way, Upminster
contrary to Policy 7 of the Havering Local Plan and the Residential Extensions and Alterations
Supplementary Planning Document.
Policies cited
Havering Local Plan 26D4Havering Local Plan 7
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.