Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringGidea Park wardP0809.99
Planning application · Havering

P0809.99.

5 Elm Walk Gidea Park Romford

Full / Other Planning at 5 Elm Walk Gidea Park Romford, received 14 Jun 2099 — withdrawn on 3 Nov 2099 (delegated, Pauline Tillett).

HaveringGidea ParkP0809.99
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Withdrawn
Outcome
3 Nov 2099
20 wks
Decision time
12 wks over the 8-week target
0
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey rear extension

Reference
P0809.99
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
14 Jun 2099
Validated
22 Jun 2099
Target date
9 Aug 2099
Decision date
3 Nov 2099
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Withdrawn
Reference
P0809.99
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
14 Jun 2099
Validated
22 Jun 2099
Target date
9 Aug 2099
Decision date
3 Nov 2099
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Withdrawn
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Withdrawn on 3 Nov 2099, delegated decision by Pauline Tillett — 20 weeks from submission (12 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
14 Jun 2099
Application received
22 Jun 2099
Application validated
9 Aug 2099
Statutory target date
3 Nov 2099
Delegated decision: Withdrawn · Pauline Tillett
14 Jun 2099
Application received
22 Jun 2099
Application validated
9 Aug 2099
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
3 Nov 2099
Delegated decision: Withdrawn · Pauline Tillett

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.