Planning application · Havering
P0832.24.
370 MAWNEY ROAD ROMFORD RM7 8QP
Full / Other Planning at 370 MAWNEY ROAD ROMFORD RM7 8QP, received 13 Jun 2024 — refused on 12 Aug 2024 (delegated, Marnie Smith).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
12 Aug 2024
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
4
Conditions
attached to the decision
8
Documents
8 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Replacement of garage with new dwellinghouse
Reference
P0832.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM7 8QP
Ward
Council
Received
13 Jun 2024
Target date
12 Aug 2024
Decision date
12 Aug 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse (Appealed) Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Reference
P0832.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM7 8QP
Ward
Council
Received
13 Jun 2024
Target date
12 Aug 2024
Decision date
12 Aug 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse (Appealed) Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 12 Aug 2024, delegated decision by Marnie Smith — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
13 Jun 2024
Application received
12 Aug 2024
Statutory target date
12 Aug 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Marnie Smith
13 Jun 2024
Application received
12 Aug 2024
Statutory target date
12 Aug 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Marnie Smith
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The bulk, scale and mass of the proposed development in close proximity to the boundaries,
on a prominent corner location, would appear as an unneighbourly cramped overdevelopment
HAVPDECR (ODB Jan 2022) P0832.24 - 12th August 2024 1 of 3
of the site, incongruous with the local pattern of development and out of character with the
surrounding built form, therefore harmful to local character and detrimental to neighbouring
residential amenity, contrary to Policies 7, 10 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan 2021 and
Policies D4 and D6 of the London Plan 2021.
2
The constraints of the site in conjunction with the design approach adopted would be to the
detriment of the amenity of future occupiers. The proposal would lead to poor quality outlook
from habitable rooms, low celling heights and close proximity to an electrical sub-station to the
detriment of the future occupiers, contrary to the aims of Policies 7, 10 and 26 of the Havering
Local Plan 2021 and Policies D4 and D6 of the London Plan 2021.
1
The bulk, scale and mass of the proposed development in close proximity to the boundaries,
on a prominent corner location, would appear as an unneighbourly cramped overdevelopment
HAVPDECR (ODB Jan 2022) P0832.24 - 12th August 2024 1 of 3
of the site, incongruous with the local pattern of development and out of character with the
surrounding built form, therefore harmful to local character and detrimental to neighbouring
residential amenity, contrary to Policies 7, 10 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan 2021 and
Policies D4 and D6 of the London Plan 2021.
2
The constraints of the site in conjunction with the design approach adopted would be to the
detriment of the amenity of future occupiers. The proposal would lead to poor quality outlook
from habitable rooms, low celling heights and close proximity to an electrical sub-station to the
detriment of the future occupiers, contrary to the aims of Policies 7, 10 and 26 of the Havering
Local Plan 2021 and Policies D4 and D6 of the London Plan 2021.
Policies cited
Havering Local Plan 7Havering Local Plan 10Havering Local Plan 26D4D6
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.