Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringCranham wardP0881.24
Planning application · Havering

P0881.24.

133 Upminster Court, Coach House Hall Lane Upminster RM14 1AL

Full / Other Planning at 133 Upminster Court, Coach House Hall Lane Upminster RM14 1AL, received 21 Jun 2024 — refused on 13 Sep 2024 (delegated, Adele Hughes).

HaveringCranhamRM14 1ALP0881.24
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
13 Sep 2024
12 wks
Decision time
4 wks over the 8-week target
4
Conditions
attached to the decision
10
Documents
10 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Refurbishment, internal alterations and side extension to grade II listed building, change of use from mixed use building to into training centre with overnight accommodation.

Reference
P0881.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM14 1AL
Council
Received
21 Jun 2024
Validated
24 Jun 2024
Target date
13 Sep 2024
Decision date
13 Sep 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P0881.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM14 1AL
Council
Received
21 Jun 2024
Validated
24 Jun 2024
Target date
13 Sep 2024
Decision date
13 Sep 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Document
13 Sept 2024
Document
13 Sept 2024
Document
25 Jun 2024
Document
24 Jun 2024
Document
24 Jun 2024
Document
24 Jun 2024
Document
24 Jun 2024
Document
24 Jun 2024
Document
24 Jun 2024
Document
24 Jun 2024
Document
13 Sept 2024
Document
13 Sept 2024
Document
25 Jun 2024
Show all 10 rows
Document
24 Jun 2024
Document
24 Jun 2024
Document
24 Jun 2024
Document
24 Jun 2024
Document
24 Jun 2024
Document
24 Jun 2024
Document
24 Jun 2024

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 13 Sep 2024, delegated decision by Adele Hughes — 12 weeks from submission (4 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
21 Jun 2024
Application received
24 Jun 2024
Application validated
13 Sep 2024
Statutory target date
13 Sep 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Adele Hughes
21 Jun 2024
Application received
24 Jun 2024
Application validated
13 Sep 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
13 Sep 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Adele Hughes

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed linked extension to the stable block would, by reason of its scale, length and siting, be harmful to its special architectural interest and this structure would detract from its symmetric form, individuality and character as a purpose-built, Grade II listed stable block, contrary to Policies 26 and 28 of the Havering Local Plan, Policy HC1 of the London Plan and the guidance contained in the National Planning Policy Framework.
2
Enclosing the existing open courtyard of the stable block with an internal structure would, by reason of its scale, siting and materials, be harmful to its architectural character and special interest, appear incongruous, be unsympathetic and detract from the significant architectural character and setting of this Grade II listed building, contrary to Policies 26 and 28 of the Havering Local Plan, Policy HC1 of the London Plan and the guidance contained in the National Planning Policy Framework.
1
The proposed linked extension to the stable block would, by reason of its scale, length and siting, be harmful to its special architectural interest and this structure would detract from its symmetric form, individuality and character as a purpose-built, Grade II listed stable block, contrary to Policies 26 and 28 of the Havering Local Plan, Policy HC1 of the London Plan and the guidance contained in the National Planning Policy Framework.
2
Enclosing the existing open courtyard of the stable block with an internal structure would, by reason of its scale, siting and materials, be harmful to its architectural character and special interest, appear incongruous, be unsympathetic and detract from the significant architectural character and setting of this Grade II listed building, contrary to Policies 26 and 28 of the Havering Local Plan, Policy HC1 of the London Plan and the guidance contained in the National Planning Policy Framework.
Policies cited
Havering Local Plan 26Havering Local Plan 28HC1NPPF

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.