Planning application · Havering
P0952.99.
Full / Other Planning at 79 Coniston Avenue Upminster, received 14 Jul 2099 — approved on 13 Aug 2099 (delegated, Terry Hardwick).
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
13 Aug 2099
4 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
7
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Single storey front/rear extensions
Reference
P0952.99
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
14 Jul 2099
Validated
16 Jul 2099
Target date
8 Sep 2099
Decision date
13 Aug 2099
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Reference
P0952.99
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
14 Jul 2099
Validated
16 Jul 2099
Target date
8 Sep 2099
Decision date
13 Aug 2099
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
No documents are recorded for this application.
Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Approved on 13 Aug 2099, delegated decision by Terry Hardwick — 4 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
14 Jul 2099
Application received
16 Jul 2099
Application validated
8 Sep 2099
Statutory target date
13 Aug 2099
Delegated decision: Approved · Terry Hardwick
14 Jul 2099
Application received
16 Jul 2099
Application validated
8 Sep 2099
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
13 Aug 2099
Delegated decision: Approved · Terry Hardwick
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.