Planning application · Havering
P0982.24.
1 Banyards Hornchurch RM11 2QJ
Full / Other Planning at 1 Banyards Hornchurch RM11 2QJ, received 10 Jul 2024 — refused on 4 Sep 2024 (delegated, Louise Jarrett).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
4 Sep 2024
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
5
Documents
5 linked
0
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Proposed front and side boundary treatments
Reference
P0982.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
10 Jul 2024
Target date
4 Sep 2024
Decision date
4 Sep 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Reference
P0982.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
10 Jul 2024
Target date
4 Sep 2024
Decision date
4 Sep 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 4 Sep 2024, delegated decision by Louise Jarrett — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
10 Jul 2024
Application received
4 Sep 2024
Statutory target date
4 Sep 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Louise Jarrett
10 Jul 2024
Application received
4 Sep 2024
Statutory target date
4 Sep 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Louise Jarrett
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed boundary treatment would, by reason of its height, length, design, materials
appear incongruous and form an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature within
the street, harmful to the appearance of the street scene and detracting from the character of
the surrounding area and the visual amenity of the locality. As such, the proposed front
boundary treatment is considered to be contrary to Policy 26 of the Havering Local Plan 2021
and the Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD.
1
The proposed boundary treatment would, by reason of its height, length, design, materials
appear incongruous and form an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature within
the street, harmful to the appearance of the street scene and detracting from the character of
the surrounding area and the visual amenity of the locality. As such, the proposed front
boundary treatment is considered to be contrary to Policy 26 of the Havering Local Plan 2021
and the Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD.
Policies cited
Havering Local Plan 26
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.