Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Havering›…Havering-atte-Bower ward›P1048.22
Planning application · Havering

P1048.22.

108 LODGE LANE ROMFORD RM5 2ET

Full / Other Planning at 108 LODGE LANE ROMFORD RM5 2ET, received 25 Jun 2022 — refused on 14 Oct 2022 (delegated, Kelvin Naicker).

Havering›Havering-atte-Bower›RM5 2ET›P1048.22
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
14 Oct 2022
16 wks
Decision time
8 wks over the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

New single detached garage in front garden

Reference
P1048.22
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM5 2ET
Ward
Council
Received
25 Jun 2022
Validated
22 Jul 2022
Target date
14 Oct 2022
Decision date
14 Oct 2022
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Reference
P1048.22
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM5 2ET
Ward
Council
Received
25 Jun 2022
Validated
22 Jul 2022
Target date
14 Oct 2022
Decision date
14 Oct 2022
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 14 Oct 2022, delegated decision by Kelvin Naicker — 16 weeks from submission (8 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
25 Jun 2022
Application received
22 Jul 2022
Application validated
14 Oct 2022
Statutory target date
14 Oct 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Kelvin Naicker
25 Jun 2022
Application received
22 Jul 2022
Application validated
14 Oct 2022
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
14 Oct 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Kelvin Naicker

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.