Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringRainham & Wennington wardP1078.20
Planning application · Havering

P1078.20.

127 Briscoe Road Rainham RM13 9QQ

Full / Other Planning at 127 Briscoe Road Rainham RM13 9QQ, received 31 Jul 2020 — refused on 25 Sep 2020 (delegated, Sam Cadman).

HaveringRainham & WenningtonRM13 9QQP1078.20
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
25 Sep 2020
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
3
Conditions
attached to the decision
6
Documents
6 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey front, side and rear extensions. Loft conversion to include rear dormer, and roof alterations to include an increase in roof space and height (300mm).

Reference
P1078.20
Type
Full Planning Permission
Case officer
Postcode
RM13 9QQ
Council
Received
31 Jul 2020
Target date
25 Sep 2020
Decision date
25 Sep 2020
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P1078.20
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Case officer
Postcode
RM13 9QQ
Council
Received
31 Jul 2020
Target date
25 Sep 2020
Decision date
25 Sep 2020
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
Officer Report
Supporting Document
Supporting Document
Drawing
Application Form
Decision Notice
Officer Report
Supporting Document
Show all 6 rows
Supporting Document
Drawing
Application Form

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 25 Sep 2020, delegated decision by Sam Cadman — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
31 Jul 2020
Application received
25 Sep 2020
Statutory target date
25 Sep 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Sam Cadman
31 Jul 2020
Application received
25 Sep 2020
Statutory target date
25 Sep 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Sam Cadman

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.