Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Havering›…Ardleigh Green ward36 Tyle Green Emerson Park Hornchurch›P1088.99
Planning application · Havering

P1088.99.

36 Tyle Green Emerson Park Hornchurch

Full / Other Planning at 36 Tyle Green Emerson Park Hornchurch, received 11 Aug 2099 — refused on 28 Sep 2099 (delegated, Philip Comer).

No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
28 Sep 2099
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
1
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

First floor front extension

Reference
P1088.99
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
11 Aug 2099
Validated
13 Aug 2099
Target date
6 Oct 2099
Decision date
28 Sep 2099
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Reference
P1088.99
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
11 Aug 2099
Validated
13 Aug 2099
Target date
6 Oct 2099
Decision date
28 Sep 2099
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 28 Sep 2099, delegated decision by Philip Comer — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
11 Aug 2099
Application received
13 Aug 2099
Application validated
6 Oct 2099
Statutory target date
28 Sep 2099
Delegated decision: Refused · Philip Comer
11 Aug 2099
Application received
13 Aug 2099
Application validated
6 Oct 2099
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
28 Sep 2099
Delegated decision: Refused · Philip Comer

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.