Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringRush Grn & Crowlands wardP1095.22
Planning application · Havering

P1095.22.

99 Mildmay Road Romford RM7 7BT

Full / Other Planning at 99 Mildmay Road Romford RM7 7BT, received 4 Jul 2022 — refused on 26 Aug 2022 (delegated, Kelvin Naicker).

HaveringRush Grn & CrowlandsRM7 7BTP1095.22
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
26 Aug 2022
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

First Floor Rear Extension and Conversion of Roof from Hip to Gable End

Reference
P1095.22
Type
Full Planning Permission
Case officer
Postcode
RM7 7BT
Council
Received
4 Jul 2022
Target date
29 Aug 2022
Decision date
26 Aug 2022
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P1095.22
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Case officer
Postcode
RM7 7BT
Council
Received
4 Jul 2022
Target date
29 Aug 2022
Decision date
26 Aug 2022
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 26 Aug 2022, delegated decision by Kelvin Naicker — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
4 Jul 2022
Application received
29 Aug 2022
Statutory target date
26 Aug 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Kelvin Naicker
4 Jul 2022
Application received
29 Aug 2022
Statutory target date
26 Aug 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Kelvin Naicker

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.