Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringCranham wardP1167.19
Planning application · Havering

P1167.19.

46 Holden Way Upminster RM14 1BT

Full / Other Planning at 46 Holden Way Upminster RM14 1BT, received 26 Jul 2019 — approved on 18 Oct 2019 (delegated, Aidan Hughes).

HaveringCranhamRM14 1BTP1167.19
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
18 Oct 2019
12 wks
Decision time
4 wks over the 8-week target
5
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey rear extension

Reference
P1167.19
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM14 1BT
Council
Received
26 Jul 2019
Validated
12 Aug 2019
Target date
18 Oct 2019
Decision date
18 Oct 2019
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P1167.19
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM14 1BT
Council
Received
26 Jul 2019
Validated
12 Aug 2019
Target date
18 Oct 2019
Decision date
18 Oct 2019
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 18 Oct 2019, delegated decision by Aidan Hughes — 12 weeks from submission (4 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
26 Jul 2019
Application received
12 Aug 2019
Application validated
18 Oct 2019
Statutory target date
18 Oct 2019
Delegated decision: Approved · Aidan Hughes
26 Jul 2019
Application received
12 Aug 2019
Application validated
18 Oct 2019
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
18 Oct 2019
Delegated decision: Approved · Aidan Hughes

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.