Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringMawneys wardP1259.24
Planning application · Havering

P1259.24.

24 Abbotts Close Romford RM7 8QU

Full / Other Planning at 24 Abbotts Close Romford RM7 8QU, received 16 Sep 2024 — refused on 18 Dec 2024 (delegated, Issa Mirza).

HaveringMawneysRM7 8QUP1259.24
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
18 Dec 2024
13 wks
Decision time
5 wks over the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
8
Documents
8 linked
0
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey side/front extension following demolition of existing shed

Reference
P1259.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM7 8QU
Council
Received
16 Sep 2024
Validated
23 Oct 2024
Target date
18 Dec 2024
Decision date
18 Dec 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P1259.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM7 8QU
Council
Received
16 Sep 2024
Validated
23 Oct 2024
Target date
18 Dec 2024
Decision date
18 Dec 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
18 Dec 2024
Decision Notice
18 Dec 2024
Supporting Document
24 Oct 2024
Drawing
23 Oct 2024
Drawing
17 Sept 2024
Application Form
17 Sept 2024
Drawing
17 Sept 2024
Supporting Document
17 Sept 2024
Decision Notice
18 Dec 2024
Decision Notice
18 Dec 2024
Supporting Document
24 Oct 2024
Show all 8 rows
Drawing
23 Oct 2024
Drawing
17 Sept 2024
Application Form
17 Sept 2024
Drawing
17 Sept 2024
Supporting Document
17 Sept 2024

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 18 Dec 2024, delegated decision by Issa Mirza — 13 weeks from submission (5 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
16 Sep 2024
Application received
23 Oct 2024
Application validated
18 Dec 2024
Statutory target date
18 Dec 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Issa Mirza
16 Sep 2024
Application received
23 Oct 2024
Application validated
18 Dec 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
18 Dec 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Issa Mirza

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed extension, by reason of its scale, bulk and design, in particular its positioning significantly forward of the front building line and proximity to the side boundary of the site, as well as incongruous roof design, would give rise to a visually jarring and intrusive form of development, which is out of scale and character with the subject property and wider streetscene and intrusive and overbearing in relation to the neighbouring property no.26 Abbotts Close, contrary to Policies 7 and 26 of the Local Plan and the provisions of the Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD. HAVPDECR (ODB Jan 2022) P1259.24 - 18th December 2024 1 of 4
1
The proposed extension, by reason of its scale, bulk and design, in particular its positioning significantly forward of the front building line and proximity to the side boundary of the site, as well as incongruous roof design, would give rise to a visually jarring and intrusive form of development, which is out of scale and character with the subject property and wider streetscene and intrusive and overbearing in relation to the neighbouring property no.26 Abbotts Close, contrary to Policies 7 and 26 of the Local Plan and the provisions of the Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD. HAVPDECR (ODB Jan 2022) P1259.24 - 18th December 2024 1 of 4
Policies cited
Local Plan 7Local Plan 26

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.