Planning application · Havering
P1260.24.
231 Wingletye Lane Hornchurch RM11 3BL
Full / Other Planning at 231 Wingletye Lane Hornchurch RM11 3BL, received 17 Sep 2024 — refused on 27 Nov 2024 (delegated, Aidan Hughes).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
27 Nov 2024
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
7
Documents
7 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Raised patio and boundary wall to rear and alterations to existing steps - part retrospective
Reference
P1260.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM11 3BL
Ward
Council
Received
17 Sep 2024
Validated
23 Sep 2024
Target date
27 Nov 2024
Decision date
27 Nov 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse (Appealed) Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Reference
P1260.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM11 3BL
Ward
Council
Received
17 Sep 2024
Validated
23 Sep 2024
Target date
27 Nov 2024
Decision date
27 Nov 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse (Appealed) Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 27 Nov 2024, delegated decision by Aidan Hughes — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
17 Sep 2024
Application received
23 Sep 2024
Application validated
27 Nov 2024
Statutory target date
27 Nov 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Aidan Hughes
17 Sep 2024
Application received
23 Sep 2024
Application validated
27 Nov 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
27 Nov 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Aidan Hughes
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The retention of the proposal including raised patio and boundary treatment would, by reason
of its position and proximity to the neighbouring property would result in the potential for
perceived over/inter-looking and loss of privacy and that the measures to include a proposed
higher boundary treatment would exacerbate the impact further by providing an element which
would be unacceptably dominant, overbearing and oppressive which would impact on the
outlook and amenity of the adjacent neighbours at No.229 Wingletye Lane, Hornchurch
contrary to the Policies 7 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan, Residential Extension and
Alterations Supplementary Planning Document SPD and the guidance within the NPPF.
HAVPDECR (ODB Jan 2022) P1260.24 - 27th November 2024 1 of 4
1
The retention of the proposal including raised patio and boundary treatment would, by reason
of its position and proximity to the neighbouring property would result in the potential for
perceived over/inter-looking and loss of privacy and that the measures to include a proposed
higher boundary treatment would exacerbate the impact further by providing an element which
would be unacceptably dominant, overbearing and oppressive which would impact on the
outlook and amenity of the adjacent neighbours at No.229 Wingletye Lane, Hornchurch
contrary to the Policies 7 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan, Residential Extension and
Alterations Supplementary Planning Document SPD and the guidance within the NPPF.
HAVPDECR (ODB Jan 2022) P1260.24 - 27th November 2024 1 of 4
Policies cited
Havering Local Plan 7Havering Local Plan 26NPPF
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.