Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringRainham & Wennington wardRM13 9LN44 Parsonage Road Rainham RM13 9LNP1317.24
Planning application · Havering

P1317.24.

44 Parsonage Road Rainham RM13 9LN

Full / Other Planning at 44 Parsonage Road Rainham RM13 9LN, received 1 Oct 2024 — refused on 26 Nov 2024 (delegated, Marnie Smith).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
26 Nov 2024
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
3
Conditions
attached to the decision
5
Documents
5 linked
0
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey rear extension, creation of first floor with rear projection and fenestration changes to front elevation

Reference
P1317.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
1 Oct 2024
Target date
26 Nov 2024
Decision date
26 Nov 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P1317.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
1 Oct 2024
Target date
26 Nov 2024
Decision date
26 Nov 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
26 Nov 2024
Decision Notice
26 Nov 2024
Application Form
2 Oct 2024
Drawing
2 Oct 2024
Supporting Document
2 Oct 2024
Decision Notice
26 Nov 2024
Decision Notice
26 Nov 2024
Application Form
2 Oct 2024
Show all 5 rows
Drawing
2 Oct 2024
Supporting Document
2 Oct 2024

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 26 Nov 2024, delegated decision by Marnie Smith — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
1 Oct 2024
Application received
26 Nov 2024
Statutory target date
26 Nov 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Marnie Smith
1 Oct 2024
Application received
26 Nov 2024
Statutory target date
26 Nov 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Marnie Smith

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed first floor rear loft extension would, by reason of its depth, bulk and proximity to the boundary with the neighbouring property no.46 Parsonage Road, give rise to an intrusive, overbearing and unneighbourly development that would have a significant adverse effect on the amenities of these adjacent occupiers contrary to Policy 7 of the Havering Local Plan and the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document.
2
The proposed first floor rear loft extension would appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the rear garden environment harmful to the established character and appearance of the host property and visual amenity of the surrounding area, contrary to Policy 7 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan, and the Residential Extensions and Alterations HAVPDECR (ODB Jan 2022) P1317.24 - 26th November 2024 1 of 4 Supplementary Planning Document.
1
The proposed first floor rear loft extension would, by reason of its depth, bulk and proximity to the boundary with the neighbouring property no.46 Parsonage Road, give rise to an intrusive, overbearing and unneighbourly development that would have a significant adverse effect on the amenities of these adjacent occupiers contrary to Policy 7 of the Havering Local Plan and the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document.
2
The proposed first floor rear loft extension would appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the rear garden environment harmful to the established character and appearance of the host property and visual amenity of the surrounding area, contrary to Policy 7 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan, and the Residential Extensions and Alterations HAVPDECR (ODB Jan 2022) P1317.24 - 26th November 2024 1 of 4 Supplementary Planning Document.
Policies cited
Havering Local Plan 7Havering Local Plan 26

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.