Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Havering›…Harold Wood ward›P1416.99
Planning application · Havering

P1416.99.

1 Four Wantz Cottages Hall Lane Upminster

Full / Other Planning at 1 Four Wantz Cottages Hall Lane Upminster, received 20 Oct 2099 — approved on 2 Dec 2099 (delegated, Matt Gallagher).

Havering›Harold Wood›P1416.99
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
2 Dec 2099
6 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
7
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Two storey side extension

Reference
P1416.99
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
20 Oct 2099
Validated
22 Oct 2099
Target date
15 Dec 2099
Decision date
2 Dec 2099
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Reference
P1416.99
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
20 Oct 2099
Validated
22 Oct 2099
Target date
15 Dec 2099
Decision date
2 Dec 2099
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 2 Dec 2099, delegated decision by Matt Gallagher — 6 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
20 Oct 2099
Application received
22 Oct 2099
Application validated
15 Dec 2099
Statutory target date
2 Dec 2099
Delegated decision: Approved · Matt Gallagher
20 Oct 2099
Application received
22 Oct 2099
Application validated
15 Dec 2099
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
2 Dec 2099
Delegated decision: Approved · Matt Gallagher

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.