Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringHeaton wardP1451.99
Planning application · Havering

P1451.99.

11A Heaton Way Romford

Full / Other Planning at 11A Heaton Way Romford, received 25 Oct 2099 — approved on 20 Dec 2099 (delegated, Matt Gallagher).

HaveringHeatonP1451.99
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
20 Dec 2099
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Two storey rear extension

Reference
P1451.99
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
25 Oct 2099
Validated
29 Oct 2099
Target date
20 Dec 2099
Decision date
20 Dec 2099
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P1451.99
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
25 Oct 2099
Validated
29 Oct 2099
Target date
20 Dec 2099
Decision date
20 Dec 2099
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 20 Dec 2099, delegated decision by Matt Gallagher — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
25 Oct 2099
Application received
29 Oct 2099
Application validated
20 Dec 2099
Statutory target date
20 Dec 2099
Delegated decision: Approved · Matt Gallagher
25 Oct 2099
Application received
29 Oct 2099
Application validated
20 Dec 2099
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
20 Dec 2099
Delegated decision: Approved · Matt Gallagher

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.