Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringSquirrels Heath wardP1490.24
Planning application · Havering

P1490.24.

10 Helen Road Hornchurch RM11 2EW

Full / Other Planning at 10 Helen Road Hornchurch RM11 2EW, received 8 Nov 2024 — refused on 5 Mar 2025 (delegated, Aidan Hughes).

HaveringSquirrels HeathRM11 2EWP1490.24
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
5 Mar 2025
17 wks
Decision time
9 wks over the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
8
Documents
8 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Retrospective application for a loft conversion to create first floor with two side dormers, single storey rear extension and alterations to fenestration including installation of additional ground floor window on East side elevation & front porch.

Reference
P1490.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM11 2EW
Council
Received
8 Nov 2024
Validated
13 Nov 2024
Target date
5 Mar 2025
Decision date
5 Mar 2025
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse (Appealed) Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P1490.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM11 2EW
Council
Received
8 Nov 2024
Validated
13 Nov 2024
Target date
5 Mar 2025
Decision date
5 Mar 2025
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse (Appealed) Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Document
27 Aug 2025
Document
5 Mar 2025
Document
5 Mar 2025
Document
5 Mar 2025
Document
10 Jan 2025
Document
14 Nov 2024
Document
11 Nov 2024
Document
11 Nov 2024
Document
27 Aug 2025
Document
5 Mar 2025
Document
5 Mar 2025
Show all 8 rows
Document
5 Mar 2025
Document
10 Jan 2025
Document
14 Nov 2024
Document
11 Nov 2024
Document
11 Nov 2024

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 5 Mar 2025, delegated decision by Aidan Hughes — 17 weeks from submission (9 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
8 Nov 2024
Application received
13 Nov 2024
Application validated
5 Mar 2025
Statutory target date
5 Mar 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Aidan Hughes
8 Nov 2024
Application received
13 Nov 2024
Application validated
5 Mar 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
5 Mar 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Aidan Hughes

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The development to be retained would, by reason of its height, bulk, mass and fenestration used to the front of the dormer, appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the streetscene harmful to the appearance of the surrounding area contrary to Policy 26 of the Havering Local Plan, London Plan Policy D4 and the design guidance within the Council's Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD. HAVPDECR (ODB Jan 2022) P1490.24 - 5th March 2025 1 of 4
1
The development to be retained would, by reason of its height, bulk, mass and fenestration used to the front of the dormer, appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the streetscene harmful to the appearance of the surrounding area contrary to Policy 26 of the Havering Local Plan, London Plan Policy D4 and the design guidance within the Council's Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD. HAVPDECR (ODB Jan 2022) P1490.24 - 5th March 2025 1 of 4
Policies cited
Havering Local Plan 26D4

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.