Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringEmerson Park wardP1606.24
Planning application · Havering

P1606.24.

108 Parkstone Avenue Hornchurch RM11 3LR

Full / Other Planning at 108 Parkstone Avenue Hornchurch RM11 3LR, received 5 Dec 2024 — refused on 4 Feb 2025 (delegated, Marnie Smith).

HaveringEmerson ParkRM11 3LRP1606.24
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
4 Feb 2025
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
6
Documents
6 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Roof alterations for conversion of loft with an increase in roof height, dormers and part hip to gable roof extensions

Reference
P1606.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Case officer
Postcode
RM11 3LR
Council
Received
5 Dec 2024
Validated
10 Dec 2024
Target date
4 Feb 2025
Decision date
4 Feb 2025
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P1606.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Case officer
Postcode
RM11 3LR
Council
Received
5 Dec 2024
Validated
10 Dec 2024
Target date
4 Feb 2025
Decision date
4 Feb 2025
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Document
4 Feb 2025
Document
4 Feb 2025
Document
11 Dec 2024
Document
9 Dec 2024
Document
9 Dec 2024
Document
9 Dec 2024
Document
4 Feb 2025
Document
4 Feb 2025
Document
11 Dec 2024
Show all 6 rows
Document
9 Dec 2024
Document
9 Dec 2024
Document
9 Dec 2024

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 4 Feb 2025, delegated decision by Marnie Smith — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
5 Dec 2024
Application received
10 Dec 2024
Application validated
4 Feb 2025
Statutory target date
4 Feb 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Marnie Smith
5 Dec 2024
Application received
10 Dec 2024
Application validated
4 Feb 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
4 Feb 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Marnie Smith

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The cumulative impact of the proposed roof extensions, height increase and dormers by reason of the height, bulk and mass would not appear suitably subservient to the scale of the existing dwelling and it would appear as a dominant and intrusive feature to the detriment of the character and appearance of the host property and visual amenity of the locality contrary to Policies 7 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan and the Council's Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document.
1
The cumulative impact of the proposed roof extensions, height increase and dormers by reason of the height, bulk and mass would not appear suitably subservient to the scale of the existing dwelling and it would appear as a dominant and intrusive feature to the detriment of the character and appearance of the host property and visual amenity of the locality contrary to Policies 7 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan and the Council's Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document.
Policies cited
Havering Local Plan 7Havering Local Plan 26

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.