Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Havering›…Rush Grn & Crowlands ward›P1608.23
Planning application · Havering

P1608.23.

Rear of 66 Crow Lane Romford RM7 0EP

Full / Other Planning at Rear of 66 Crow Lane Romford RM7 0EP, received 27 Oct 2023 — refused on 15 Dec 2023 (delegated, Guy Fanning).

Havering›Rush Grn & Crowlands›RM7 0EP›P1608.23
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
15 Dec 2023
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
3
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Conversion of detached garage to rear to single storey, 1-bed studio flat, with associated parking and amenity space following demolition of existing outbuilding.

Reference
P1608.23
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM7 0EP
Ward
Council
Received
27 Oct 2023
Target date
22 Dec 2023
Decision date
15 Dec 2023
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Reference
P1608.23
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM7 0EP
Ward
Council
Received
27 Oct 2023
Target date
22 Dec 2023
Decision date
15 Dec 2023
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 15 Dec 2023, delegated decision by Guy Fanning — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
27 Oct 2023
Application received
22 Dec 2023
Statutory target date
15 Dec 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Guy Fanning
27 Oct 2023
Application received
22 Dec 2023
Statutory target date
15 Dec 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Guy Fanning

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.