Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Havering›…Heaton ward65 Masefield Crescent Harold Hill Romford›P1609.07
Planning application · Havering

P1609.07.

65 Masefield Crescent Harold Hill Romford

Full / Other Planning at 65 Masefield Crescent Harold Hill Romford, received 23 Aug 2007 — withdrawn on 16 Oct 2007 (delegated, Evert Grobbelaar).

Havering›Heaton›P1609.07
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Withdrawn
Outcome
16 Oct 2007
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
0
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey rear extension

Reference
P1609.07
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
23 Aug 2007
Target date
18 Oct 2007
Decision date
16 Oct 2007
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Withdrawn
Premises record
Council register
Reference
P1609.07
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
23 Aug 2007
Target date
18 Oct 2007
Decision date
16 Oct 2007
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Withdrawn
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Withdrawn on 16 Oct 2007, delegated decision by Evert Grobbelaar — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
23 Aug 2007
Application received
18 Oct 2007
Statutory target date
16 Oct 2007
Delegated decision: Withdrawn · Evert Grobbelaar
23 Aug 2007
Application received
18 Oct 2007
Statutory target date
16 Oct 2007
Delegated decision: Withdrawn · Evert Grobbelaar

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.