Planning application · Havering
P1669.24.
8 Finucane Gardens Rainham RM13 7QA
Full / Other Planning at 8 Finucane Gardens Rainham RM13 7QA, received 19 Dec 2024 — refused on 17 Feb 2025 (delegated, Aidan Hughes).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
17 Feb 2025
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
3
Conditions
attached to the decision
6
Documents
6 linked
0
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Loft conversion with dormers to front and rear
Reference
P1669.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM13 7QA
Ward
Council
Received
19 Dec 2024
Validated
23 Dec 2024
Target date
17 Feb 2025
Decision date
17 Feb 2025
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Reference
P1669.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM13 7QA
Ward
Council
Received
19 Dec 2024
Validated
23 Dec 2024
Target date
17 Feb 2025
Decision date
17 Feb 2025
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 17 Feb 2025, delegated decision by Aidan Hughes — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
19 Dec 2024
Application received
23 Dec 2024
Application validated
17 Feb 2025
Statutory target date
17 Feb 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Aidan Hughes
19 Dec 2024
Application received
23 Dec 2024
Application validated
17 Feb 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
17 Feb 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Aidan Hughes
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The introduction of the proposed front dormer windows, by reason of their position and bulk
would appear out of scale and out of character within the terraced group and be materially
harmful to the visual amenity of the surrounding area contrary to Policy 26 of the Havering
Local Plan and the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document.
2
The proposed rear dormer window, by reason of its scale, bulk and mass would appear out of
scale and character with the dwelling and materially harmful to the visual amenity of the
surrounding area contrary to Policy 26 of the Havering Local Plan and the Residential
Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document.
1
The introduction of the proposed front dormer windows, by reason of their position and bulk
would appear out of scale and out of character within the terraced group and be materially
harmful to the visual amenity of the surrounding area contrary to Policy 26 of the Havering
Local Plan and the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document.
2
The proposed rear dormer window, by reason of its scale, bulk and mass would appear out of
scale and character with the dwelling and materially harmful to the visual amenity of the
surrounding area contrary to Policy 26 of the Havering Local Plan and the Residential
Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document.
Policies cited
Havering Local Plan 26
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.