Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringHeaton wardP1676.22
Planning application · Havering

P1676.22.

2, 9, 12, 14, 15, 27 Tavistock Close Romford RM3 8HF

Full / Other Planning at 2, 9, 12, 14, 15, 27 Tavistock Close Romford RM3 8HF, received 13 Oct 2022 — withdrawn on 7 Sep 2023 (delegated, Angelle Dimech).

HaveringHeatonRM3 8HFP1676.22
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Withdrawn
Outcome
7 Sep 2023
47 wks
Decision time
39 wks over the 8-week target
0
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Retrofit of Insulation with render finish and high performance UPVC windows to 2,9,12,14,15,27 Tavistock Close

Reference
P1676.22
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM3 8HF
Ward
Council
Received
13 Oct 2022
Validated
24 Oct 2022
Target date
19 Dec 2022
Decision date
7 Sep 2023
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Withdrawn
Reference
P1676.22
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM3 8HF
Ward
Council
Received
13 Oct 2022
Validated
24 Oct 2022
Target date
19 Dec 2022
Decision date
7 Sep 2023
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Withdrawn
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Withdrawn on 7 Sep 2023, delegated decision by Angelle Dimech — 47 weeks from submission (39 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
13 Oct 2022
Application received
24 Oct 2022
Application validated
19 Dec 2022
Statutory target date
7 Sep 2023
Delegated decision: Withdrawn · Angelle Dimech
13 Oct 2022
Application received
24 Oct 2022
Application validated
19 Dec 2022
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
7 Sep 2023
Delegated decision: Withdrawn · Angelle Dimech

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.