Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Havering›…Harold Wood ward2 Rosslyn Avenue Harold Wood, Romford›P1682.03
Planning application · Havering

P1682.03.

2 Rosslyn Avenue Harold Wood, Romford

Full / Other Planning at 2 Rosslyn Avenue Harold Wood, Romford, received 2 Sep 2003 — approved on 28 Oct 2003 (delegated, Rudolph Van Wyk).

Havering›Harold Wood›P1682.03
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
28 Oct 2003
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
6
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey front and side extension

Reference
P1682.03
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
2 Sep 2003
Target date
28 Oct 2003
Decision date
28 Oct 2003
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Reference
P1682.03
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
2 Sep 2003
Target date
28 Oct 2003
Decision date
28 Oct 2003
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 28 Oct 2003, delegated decision by Rudolph Van Wyk — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
2 Sep 2003
Application received
28 Oct 2003
Statutory target date
28 Oct 2003
Delegated decision: Approved · Rudolph Van Wyk
2 Sep 2003
Application received
28 Oct 2003
Statutory target date
28 Oct 2003
Delegated decision: Approved · Rudolph Van Wyk

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.