Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Havering›…Harold Wood ward›P1695.06
Planning application · Havering

P1695.06.

1 Mason Drive Harold Wood Romford

Full / Other Planning at 1 Mason Drive Harold Wood Romford, received 30 Aug 2006 — refused on 25 Oct 2006 (delegated, Robert Chiat).

Havering›Harold Wood›P1695.06
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
25 Oct 2006
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single/two storey side extension incorporating front canopy

Reference
P1695.06
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
30 Aug 2006
Target date
25 Oct 2006
Decision date
25 Oct 2006
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Reference
P1695.06
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
30 Aug 2006
Target date
25 Oct 2006
Decision date
25 Oct 2006
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 25 Oct 2006, delegated decision by Robert Chiat — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
30 Aug 2006
Application received
25 Oct 2006
Statutory target date
25 Oct 2006
Delegated decision: Refused · Robert Chiat
30 Aug 2006
Application received
25 Oct 2006
Statutory target date
25 Oct 2006
Delegated decision: Refused · Robert Chiat

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.