Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Havering›…Cranham ward›P1737.14
Planning application · Havering

P1737.14.

17 Chipperfield Close Upminster

Full / Other Planning at 17 Chipperfield Close Upminster, received 30 Dec 2014 — approved on 13 Feb 2015 (delegated, Aidan Hughes).

Havering›Cranham›P1737.14
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
13 Feb 2015
6 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
6
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Demolish existing conservatory & construct a single storey rear extension

Reference
P1737.14
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
30 Dec 2014
Target date
24 Feb 2015
Decision date
13 Feb 2015
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Reference
P1737.14
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
30 Dec 2014
Target date
24 Feb 2015
Decision date
13 Feb 2015
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 13 Feb 2015, delegated decision by Aidan Hughes — 6 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
30 Dec 2014
Application received
24 Feb 2015
Statutory target date
13 Feb 2015
Delegated decision: Approved · Aidan Hughes
30 Dec 2014
Application received
24 Feb 2015
Statutory target date
13 Feb 2015
Delegated decision: Approved · Aidan Hughes

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.