Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Havering›…Hacton ward17 Tadworth Parade Elm Park Hornchurch›P1792.05
Planning application · Havering

P1792.05.

17 Tadworth Parade Elm Park Hornchurch

Full / Other Planning at 17 Tadworth Parade Elm Park Hornchurch, received 26 Sep 2005 — approved on 15 Nov 2005 (delegated, Matthew Letten).

Havering›Hacton›P1792.05
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
15 Nov 2005
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
4
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Change of use to Sui Generis Neighbourhood Police Unit with ancillary B1 office provision and replacement shop front.

Reference
P1792.05
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
26 Sep 2005
Target date
21 Nov 2005
Decision date
15 Nov 2005
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Reference
P1792.05
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
26 Sep 2005
Target date
21 Nov 2005
Decision date
15 Nov 2005
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 15 Nov 2005, delegated decision by Matthew Letten — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
26 Sep 2005
Application received
21 Nov 2005
Statutory target date
15 Nov 2005
Delegated decision: Approved · Matthew Letten
26 Sep 2005
Application received
21 Nov 2005
Statutory target date
15 Nov 2005
Delegated decision: Approved · Matthew Letten

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.