Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Havering›…Pettits ward›P1893.02
Planning application · Havering

P1893.02.

9 Brook Road Gidea Park Romford

Full / Other Planning at 9 Brook Road Gidea Park Romford, received 31 Oct 2002 — refused on 23 Dec 2002 (delegated, Daniel Naude).

Havering›Pettits›P1893.02
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
23 Dec 2002
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Demolition of garden sheds and replacement shed

Reference
P1893.02
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
31 Oct 2002
Target date
26 Dec 2002
Decision date
23 Dec 2002
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Reference
P1893.02
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
31 Oct 2002
Target date
26 Dec 2002
Decision date
23 Dec 2002
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 23 Dec 2002, delegated decision by Daniel Naude — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
31 Oct 2002
Application received
26 Dec 2002
Statutory target date
23 Dec 2002
Delegated decision: Refused · Daniel Naude
31 Oct 2002
Application received
26 Dec 2002
Statutory target date
23 Dec 2002
Delegated decision: Refused · Daniel Naude

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.