Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Havering›…Harold Wood ward›P1952.08
Planning application · Havering

P1952.08.

26 Pearcy Close Harold Hill Romford

Full / Other Planning at 26 Pearcy Close Harold Hill Romford, received 27 Nov 2008 — refused on 22 Jan 2009 (delegated, Aidan Hughes).

Havering›Harold Wood›P1952.08
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
22 Jan 2009
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Proposed conversion of existing integral garage to form additional habitable space

Reference
P1952.08
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
27 Nov 2008
Target date
22 Jan 2009
Decision date
22 Jan 2009
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Reference
P1952.08
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
27 Nov 2008
Target date
22 Jan 2009
Decision date
22 Jan 2009
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 22 Jan 2009, delegated decision by Aidan Hughes — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
27 Nov 2008
Application received
22 Jan 2009
Statutory target date
22 Jan 2009
Delegated decision: Refused · Aidan Hughes
27 Nov 2008
Application received
22 Jan 2009
Statutory target date
22 Jan 2009
Delegated decision: Refused · Aidan Hughes

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.