Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Havering›P2006.08
Planning application · Havering

P2006.08.

23 Clockhouse Lane ROMFORD RM5 3PH

Full / Other Planning at 23 Clockhouse Lane ROMFORD RM5 3PH, received 12 Jan 2008 — other on 21 Dec 2011 (delegated, Scott Hackner).

Havering›RM5 3PH›P2006.08
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Other
Outcome
21 Dec 2011
206 wks
Decision time
198 wks over the 8-week target
0
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

New External ramp to front of retail unit.

Reference
P2006.08
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM5 3PH
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
12 Jan 2008
Validated
13 Jan 2009
Target date
21 Dec 2011
Decision date
21 Dec 2011
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Lapsed application
Council register
Reference
P2006.08
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM5 3PH
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
12 Jan 2008
Validated
13 Jan 2009
Target date
21 Dec 2011
Decision date
21 Dec 2011
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Lapsed application
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Other on 21 Dec 2011, delegated decision by Scott Hackner — 206 weeks from submission (198 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
12 Jan 2008
Application received
13 Jan 2009
Application validated
21 Dec 2011
Statutory target date
21 Dec 2011
Delegated decision: Other · Scott Hackner
12 Jan 2008
Application received
13 Jan 2009
Application validated
21 Dec 2011
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
21 Dec 2011
Delegated decision: Other · Scott Hackner

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.