Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringPettits wardRM1 4BP69 MASHITERS WALK ROMFORD RM1 4BPP2056.17
Planning application · Havering

P2056.17.

69 MASHITERS WALK ROMFORD RM1 4BP

Full / Other Planning at 69 MASHITERS WALK ROMFORD RM1 4BP, received 13 Dec 2017 — approved on 27 Feb 2018 (delegated, Aidan Hughes).

HaveringPettitsRM1 4BPP2056.17
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
27 Feb 2018
11 wks
Decision time
3 wks over the 8-week target
7
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

First floor side dormer extension, side and rear ground floor extensions.

Reference
P2056.17
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
13 Dec 2017
Validated
2 Jan 2018
Target date
27 Feb 2018
Decision date
27 Feb 2018
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P2056.17
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 17 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
13 Dec 2017
Validated
2 Jan 2018
Target date
27 Feb 2018
Decision date
27 Feb 2018
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 27 Feb 2018, delegated decision by Aidan Hughes — 11 weeks from submission (3 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
13 Dec 2017
Application received
2 Jan 2018
Application validated
27 Feb 2018
Statutory target date
27 Feb 2018
Delegated decision: Approved · Aidan Hughes
13 Dec 2017
Application received
2 Jan 2018
Application validated
27 Feb 2018
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
27 Feb 2018
Delegated decision: Approved · Aidan Hughes

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.