Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Havering›…Pettits ward›P2267.04
Planning application · Havering

P2267.04.

46 Parkway Gidea Park Romford

Full / Other Planning at 46 Parkway Gidea Park Romford, received 16 Dec 2004 — withdrawn on 29 Dec 2005 (delegated, Letitia Hoff).

Havering›Pettits›P2267.04
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Withdrawn
Outcome
29 Dec 2005
54 wks
Decision time
46 wks over the 8-week target
0
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Loft conversion including 2 velux windows

Reference
P2267.04
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
16 Dec 2004
Target date
10 Feb 2005
Decision date
29 Dec 2005
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Withdrawn
Council register
Reference
P2267.04
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
16 Dec 2004
Target date
10 Feb 2005
Decision date
29 Dec 2005
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Withdrawn
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Withdrawn on 29 Dec 2005, delegated decision by Letitia Hoff — 54 weeks from submission (46 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
16 Dec 2004
Application received
10 Feb 2005
Statutory target date
29 Dec 2005
Delegated decision: Withdrawn · Letitia Hoff
16 Dec 2004
Application received
10 Feb 2005
Statutory target date
29 Dec 2005
Delegated decision: Withdrawn · Letitia Hoff

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.