Planning Atlas
Planning application · Havering

Q0087.26.

Land at Rom Valley Way (formerly Romford Ice Rink) Rom Valley Way Romford

Discharge of Conditions at Land at Rom Valley Way (formerly Romford Ice Rink) Rom Valley Way Romford, received 9 Apr 2026 — other on 4 Jun 2026 (delegated, Raphael Adenegan).

HaveringQ0087.26
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Other
Outcome
4 Jun 2026
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
0
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Details Pursuant to Condition 53 (Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS)) (for detailed scheme only) of Planning Permission P0615.21, dated 05/09/2023 for Hybrid planning application for phased mixed-use development for the provision of seven blocks (Block A to G) of 2 to 12 storeys to include up

Reference
Q0087.26
Type
Discharge of Conditions
Applicant
Case officer
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
9 Apr 2026
Target date
4 Jun 2026
Decision date
4 Jun 2026
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
ALL DECISIONS ISSUED
Reference
Q0087.26
Type
Discharge of Conditions
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Case officer
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
9 Apr 2026
Target date
4 Jun 2026
Decision date
4 Jun 2026
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
ALL DECISIONS ISSUED
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Other on 4 Jun 2026, delegated decision by Raphael Adenegan — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
9 Apr 2026
Application received
4 Jun 2026
Statutory target date
4 Jun 2026
Delegated decision: Other · Raphael Adenegan
9 Apr 2026
Application received
4 Jun 2026
Statutory target date
4 Jun 2026
Delegated decision: Other · Raphael Adenegan

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.