Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringSt Edward's wardQ0180.25
Planning application · Havering

Q0180.25.

Former Angel Way Retail Park Angel Way Romford RM1 1JH

Discharge of Conditions at Former Angel Way Retail Park Angel Way Romford RM1 1JH, received 13 Oct 2025 — other on 8 Dec 2025 (delegated, Habib Neshat).

HaveringSt Edward'sRM1 1JHQ0180.25
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Other
Outcome
8 Dec 2025
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
0
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Removal of condition No. 28 (Delivery and Servicing) of planning permission P2246.07 dated 14/12/2009 (The development proposed is a new mixed-use development of 350 residential units, a 63-bedroom hotel, ground-floor mixed retail, basement car parking and a new public square). P1921.20 Conditions(s

Reference
Q0180.25
Type
Discharge of Conditions
Applicant
Case officer
Postcode
RM1 1JH
Council
Received
13 Oct 2025
Target date
8 Dec 2025
Decision date
8 Dec 2025
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
ALL DECISIONS ISSUED
Reference
Q0180.25
Type
Discharge of Conditions
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Case officer
Postcode
RM1 1JH
Council
Received
13 Oct 2025
Target date
8 Dec 2025
Decision date
8 Dec 2025
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
ALL DECISIONS ISSUED
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Other on 8 Dec 2025, delegated decision by Habib Neshat — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
13 Oct 2025
Application received
8 Dec 2025
Statutory target date
8 Dec 2025
Delegated decision: Other · Habib Neshat
13 Oct 2025
Application received
8 Dec 2025
Statutory target date
8 Dec 2025
Delegated decision: Other · Habib Neshat

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.